Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 07:37

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Could supermassive black holes anchor the tiniest galaxies? - Big Think
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
OpenAI Wants to get College Kids Hooked on AI - Gizmodo
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
These Diabetes Drugs Are Finding New Life as an Antiaging Hack - WSJ
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Is Matt Gaetz qualified to be Attorney General of the United States?
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What transforms the philosophical intellect?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Scientists hooking flies on cocaine to study addiction: Reports - WKRN News 2